PEPTIDE CORPUS

Condition

Fat loss

9 compounds were checked against fat loss. 6 earned a graded row; the rest are named below.

Last updated

9compounds checked
6earned a graded row
3measured the condition
0mechanistic only
1recorded as absences

Recorded under Weight, alongside 4 other indications.

Compounds with a graded row

Ordered by rung, strongest first. The rung rates the study design; the chip beside it says what the study measured. Both are needed.

  1. L-Carnitine

    human RCT Direct outcome Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    adults across 37 randomised controlled trials, 2292 participants pooled; effect reported as confined to adults with overweight or obesity; trial durations vary

    A meta-analysis of 37 randomised controlled trials found pooled reductions of 1.21 kg in body weight, 0.24 kg/m2 in BMI and 2.08 kg in fat mass, with no significant change in body fat percent or waist circumference. Fat mass was measured, so this is not scale weight alone, but the unchanged body fat percent means the data do not establish a shift in composition. Restricting to high-quality trials confirmed only the body-weight effect, and the reported benefit was in overweight and obese participants.

    Source PubMed 1 primary source read for this row

  2. Retatrutide

    human RCT Direct outcome In registered trials

    Who was studied
    adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 7.0-10.5%, BMI 25-50; body-composition substudy n=189 randomised, 103 with both baseline and week-36 DXA scans, 36 weeks

    A prespecified DXA substudy of a phase 2 randomised placebo-controlled trial measured percent change in total body fat mass at 36 weeks: reductions of 15.2% (4 mg pooled), 26.1% (8 mg pooled) and 23.2% (12 mg) versus 4.5% with placebo. The population was people with type 2 diabetes, not healthy adults seeking body-composition change. The separate phase 2 obesity trial (n=338, 48 weeks, BMI 30+ or 27+ with a weight-related condition) reported scale weight only, so fat loss as distinct from weight loss rests on the diabetes substudy.

    Source PubMed 2 primary sources read for this row

  3. Tesamorelin

    human RCT Direct outcome Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    HIV-infected adults with lipodystrophy and excess abdominal fat; study 1 n=412 (273 drug / 137 placebo), study 2 n=404 (270 / 126); 26-week main phase

    Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials measured visceral adipose tissue by CT at 26 weeks: mean reductions of 27 cm2 and 21 cm2 versus a 4 cm2 increase and no change on placebo. The FDA approval (EGRIFTA SV) is specifically for reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected adults with lipodystrophy, a disease population; the label addresses no non-HIV population, and no trial in healthy adults seeking body-composition change is on file.

    Source DailyMed — the FDA label 1 primary source read for this row

  4. 5-Amino-1MQ

    animal in vivo Surrogate marker Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    diet-induced obese mice, systemic administration; no human study located

    A potent NNMT inhibitor reduced body weight and white adipose tissue mass in diet-induced obese mice without changing food intake. Adipose mass was measured, not scale weight alone, but the measurement was in mice. No human study of 5-amino-1MQ measuring body weight or body composition is on file.

    Source PubMed 1 primary source read for this row

  5. AOD-9604

    animal in vivo Surrogate marker Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    obese mice and beta-3 adrenergic receptor knock-out mice, 14 days intraperitoneal administration; no readable human study

    Chronic intraperitoneal AOD9604 reduced body weight and body fat in obese mice over 14 days; the effect on body weight and lipolysis was absent in beta-3 adrenergic receptor knock-out mice. Human trials of AOD-9604 are described in review articles only: no primary report of any AOD-9604 human trial could be reached, so no human row is graded here and the review accounts are not cited.

    Source academic.oup.com 1 primary source read for this row

  6. MOTS-c

    animal in vivo Surrogate marker Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    mice, including aged and high-fat-diet-fed animals; no human study located

    MOTS-c treatment prevented diet-induced obesity and age-dependent and diet-induced insulin resistance in mice, with skeletal muscle identified as the target tissue and AMPK activation as the mechanism. No human study of MOTS-c measuring body weight or body composition is on file.

    Source PubMed 1 primary source read for this row

Recorded absences

1 compound is listed here without a rung. Each row exists to mark a distinction a reader would otherwise draw wrongly, and each says what is missing rather than leaving the compound off the page.

  1. CJC-1295 no-DAC

    No rung — nothing on file to grade Not approved for this condition

    No graded evidence exists on this record. Every citation attached to CJC-1295 no-DAC carries a null evidence rung, and the set consists of narrative reviews, an analytical-chemistry identification of the compound in an unknown pharmaceutical preparation, and a netnography of self-reported use. No study measuring body weight or body composition after CJC-1295 no-DAC administration, in humans or animals, is on file. The row is recorded because the compound is widely sold and stacked for this purpose.

Checked, and nothing recorded

2 compounds were checked against fat loss and produced no gradeable row.

A compound is here because someone looked and the sources did not support a row — not because nobody looked. Under the rubric, uncertainty resolves to no row, and a row resting on a vendor page or a clinic blog is worse than no row at all.

What this page does not say

It reports what was measured, in whom, and how directly. It does not say what to take or at what dose, and a row here is a record of a study rather than a reason to use anything. Every rung links to the rubric that assigned it.