PEPTIDE CORPUS

Condition

Hyperpigmentation

6 compounds were checked against hyperpigmentation. 3 earned a graded row; the rest are named below.

Last updated

6compounds checked
3earned a graded row
2measured the condition
1mechanistic only

Narrower indications

Compounds with a graded row

Ordered by rung, strongest first. The rung rates the study design; the chip beside it says what the study measured. Both are needed.

  1. Decapeptide-12

    human RCT Direct outcome Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    women with Fitzpatrick phototype IV and moderate recalcitrant melasma, n=5, 16 weeks

    A split-face, randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pilot applied 0.01% decapeptide-12 twice daily and graded melasma appearance on a 10-point scale, reporting improvement on the treated side in all five participants. The diagnosis studied was melasma specifically, not post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and n=5 with an investigator grading scale rather than MASI or colorimetry is the whole human controlled record. The larger decapeptide-12 studies on file are open-label and combine the peptide with 20% glycolic acid and sunscreen, so they cannot attribute any pigment change to the peptide.

    Source PubMed 4 primary sources read for this row

  2. Tetrapeptide-30

    human RCT Direct outcome Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    women with Fitzpatrick skin types V-VI in South Africa, 12 weeks; enrolled number not reported in the source abstract

    A double-blind, vehicle-controlled study of a PKEK (tetrapeptide-30) formulation used expert grading of standardised digital images and reported the peptide formulation superior to vehicle on overall appearance and evenness of skin tone at 12 weeks; the abstract does not state the randomisation method or the number enrolled. The population was general uneven facial pigmentation in deeply pigmented skin, not a melasma diagnosis. A separate Experimental Dermatology paper reports four vehicle-controlled human studies, but its measured pigment-spot fading comes from PKEK combined with sodium ascorbyl phosphate, so that reduction is not attributable to the peptide alone.

    Source DOI 2 primary sources read for this row

  3. Nonapeptide-1

    in vitro Mechanistic only Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    cultured human epidermal melanocytes and HaCaT keratinocytes under UVA exposure; no living subjects

    Recorded, and not evidence for this condition

    Nonapeptide-1 acetate was applied to cultured human melanocytes as a comparator agent and reduced melanin content and tyrosinase activity in the dish. No study on file measured pigmentation in a living person: nothing here is skin lightening in a human, and the step from a cell assay to a visible change in melasma or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is an argument, not a result. The one human trial that includes nonapeptide-1 is a proprietary multi-ingredient melasma maintenance formulation with phenylethyl resorcinol, aminoethyl phosphinic acid, antioxidants and sunscreen, which attributes nothing to the peptide.

    Source DOI 3 primary sources read for this row

Checked, and nothing recorded

3 compounds were checked against hyperpigmentation and produced no gradeable row.

A compound is here because someone looked and the sources did not support a row — not because nobody looked. Under the rubric, uncertainty resolves to no row, and a row resting on a vendor page or a clinic blog is worse than no row at all.

What this page does not say

It reports what was measured, in whom, and how directly. It does not say what to take or at what dose, and a row here is a record of a study rather than a reason to use anything. Every rung links to the rubric that assigned it.