PEPTIDE CORPUS

Condition

Photoageing

2 compounds were checked against photoageing. 1 earned a graded row; the rest are named below.

Last updated

2compounds checked
1earned a graded row
1measured the condition
0mechanistic only

Recorded under Skin ageing, alongside 2 other indications.

Compounds with a graded row

Ordered by rung, strongest first. The rung rates the study design; the chip beside it says what the study measured. Both are needed.

  1. Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4 (Matrixyl)

    human RCT Direct outcome Not approved for this condition

    Who was studied
    Caucasian women aged 35-55 with photoaged facial skin, n=93, topical (3 ppm pal-KTTKS in a moisturiser), 12 weeks, split-face left-right randomised

    The enrolled population was photoaged facial skin specifically: a 12-week double-blind, split-face, randomised comparison of a moisturiser with and without 3 ppm palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 measured wrinkles and fine lines in photodamaged skin by image analysis and expert grading, and reported improvement versus the placebo side. It is a single cosmetic-industry trial with no independent replication on file, and the peptide has no regulatory approval for any skin condition.

    Source DOI 1 primary source read for this row

Checked, and nothing recorded

1 compound was checked against photoageing and produced no gradeable row.

A compound is here because someone looked and the sources did not support a row — not because nobody looked. Under the rubric, uncertainty resolves to no row, and a row resting on a vendor page or a clinic blog is worse than no row at all.

What this page does not say

It reports what was measured, in whom, and how directly. It does not say what to take or at what dose, and a row here is a record of a study rather than a reason to use anything. Every rung links to the rubric that assigned it.